Key result
Higher pre-procedural AF burden is linked to increased atrial arrhythmia recurrence after ablation.
Why the study?
Does a higher pre-procedural percentage of time spent in AF predict arrhythmia recurrence after ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=302)
Does a higher pre-procedural percentage of time spent in AF predict arrhythmia recurrence after ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Pre-procedural AF burden assessed by intermittent ECG monitoring is a better predictor of post-ablation recurrence than conventional paroxysmal or persistent classification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May improve pre-ablation risk stratification for recurrence; extends observational evidence but requires prospective validation.
AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is conventionally classified as paroxysmal or persistent. AF burden might better reflect response to rhythm-control interventions. This study evaluated the association between estimated pre-procedural time spent in AF and recurrences after AF ablation, compared with conventional AF classification. METHODS AND RESULTS: In patients scheduled for AF ablation, clinical characteristics were collected before ablation, and 60-second single-lead ECGs were recorded three times daily (with additional symptom-triggered recordings) for four weeks. Pre-procedural time spent in AF was estimated as the number of days with detected AF divided by total monitoring days. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence between 3 and 12 months post-ablation. Of 302 patients (mean age 64 ± 9 years; 33% female), 201 (67%) had paroxysmal AF and 101 (33%) had persistent AF. After 12 months, recurrence rates were higher in persistent than in paroxysmal AF (37.6% vs. 24.4%, P & 0.01) and in patients with a higher (>32%) vs. lower (≤32%) percentage of time spent in AF (36.4% vs. 24.0%, P < 0.01). Notably, paroxysmal AF patients with a higher percentage of time in AF had recurrence rates comparable to those of patients with persistent AF. Pre-procedural percentage of time in AF independently predicted arrhythmia recurrence at 12-month follow-up (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.0-1.1; P & 0.025). CONCLUSION: A higher pre-procedural percentage of time spent in AF derived from 60-second single-lead ECGs is independently associated with atrial arrhythmia recurrence after ablation. Assessing the percentage of pre-procedural time spent in AF might help identify paroxysmal AF patients with a high AF recurrence risk in future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Habibi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=302). Higher pre-procedural percentage of time spent in AF (>32%) vs. Lower percentage of time spent in AF (≤32%) was evaluated on AF recurrence between 3 and 12 months post-ablation (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.0-1.1, p=<0.025). A higher pre-procedural percentage of time spent in AF (>32%) was associated with increased arrhythmia recurrence after ablation compared to ≤32% (36.4% vs. 24.0%, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: