Ethnographic inquiry analyzes historical narratives using personal perspectives, suggesting deeper insights into memory and social formations.
Ethnographic inquiry requires first-person narration, even when it studies the past. This article explores two distinct ways of using "I" in historical writing: one, that which Enzo Traverso names the "singular past," speaks of the author's own story, memory, and family history; the other, that of historical ethnography, speaks through the author's grappling with ethnographic fact, about social formations that are otherwise hard to see. My argument proceeds in four parts. First, I show how the "I" of ethnography was utilized in the traditions of francophone, anglophone, and Soviet ethnography; next I explain why this narrative voice is a necessary part of the historical ethnographer's method; I then show how "singular pasts" structured Soviet and post-Soviet Russian public memory; finally, I explain how I myself used the ethnographic first person to understand Soviet history through and beyond Russian "singular pasts."
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xenia A. Cherkaev (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: