Retrospective review compares morning cortisol to cosyntropin testing for adrenal insufficiency, indicating new assay cutoffs.
Abstract Background/Objective Serum cortisol immunoassays with improved specificity for cortisol have prompted revisiting the definition of a normal response at 60-minute cosyntropin stimulation testing (CST-60) to ≥14 μg/dL. European and American Endocrine Societies define values of AM-cortisol >10 μg/dL as adequate to rule out adrenal insufficiency (AI) in patients with long-term use of corticosteroids. We sought to compare AM-cortisol levels with CST-60 in patients suspected of AI from various causes. Methods A retrospective review was performed from the electronic health record of a large midwestern hospital in patients who were evaluated for AI. Results There were 95 patients (51women, age 58.8±17.8 SD years) with 43 tests performed outpatient, 48 inpatient, and 4 ICU settings. The pre-test diagnoses were adrenal abnormalities (n=10), hyponatremia (n=11), hypoglycemia (n=9), fatigue (n=19), hypotension (n=35), pituitary abnormality (n=7) and shock (n=4). Binary logistic regression analyses (BLRA) and receiver operating curves (ROC) compared AM-cortisol as predictors of a normal CST-60 ≥ 14.6 μg/dL and to the previous criteria of a CST-60 ≥18.0 μg/dL. Receiver operating curves showed that an AM-cortisol of 11.1 μg/dL had a specificity of 93% for a CST-60 >14.6 g/dL. Using historical levels of CST-60 ≥ 18.0 μg/dL there would be 17% false positives requiring unnecessary dynamic testing. Conclusions In this community setting with low risk of AI (16%), a baseline AM-cortisol of 11.1 μg/dL can reliably preclude the need for a CST-60. Clinicians should be aware of the new cutoffs for the assays available to them when evaluating patients for AI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shrestha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: