Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates IHC markers to distinguish SCC from AC in NSCLC biopsies, suggesting diagnostic implications.
Introduction: Distinguishing SCC from AC has become crucial for tailored therapies of NSCLC. Many patients are inoperable at the time of diagnosis of NSCLC, >65% of the diagnoses are performed in small biopsies (Bx). The “IASLC/ATS/ERS international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma” (Travis W.D., Brambilla E. et al. JTO 2011; 6:244-85) firstly includes diagnostics in Bx in addition to resection specimen. We investigated the expression of IHC markers in a TMA simulating Bx. Materials and methods: The IHC markers CK5/6, p63, desmocollin-3, CK7, TTF1, and napsin were investigated in a TMA from a primary cohort of 1005 patients with resected NSCLC. Results: For SCC, desmocollin-3 showed the highest, CK5/6 a medium, and p63 the lowest specifity. The sensitivity of desmocollin-3 was similar to the combined sensitivity of CK5/6 and p63. Desmocollin-3 was expressed in about 85%, CK5/6 and p63 in >90% of all SCC. For AC, TTF1 and napsin revealed a considerably higher specifity than CK7. The sensitivity of napsin did not exceed the combined sensitivity of CK7 and TTF1. CK7 was expressed in >95% of all AC, TTF1 in <90%, and Napsin in <80%. Conclusions: To spare tumor tissue for further (e.g. molecular) analyses, diagnostic algorithms for NSCLC Bx must be established. If histology alone cannot distinguish between SCC and AC, a combination of TTF1, napsin, CK5/6 and desmocollin-3 can serve as initial diagnostic marker panel. CK7 and p63 could be used subsequently, if necessary, because of lower specifity. Currently a TMA of 300 further NSCLC is investigated, data from all 1300 NSCLC will be presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schnabel et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: