Cohort study evaluates fat and muscle indices affecting survival in non-metastatic lung cancer, suggesting new risk assessment tools.
The combined prognostic role of skeletal muscle index (SMI), subcutaneous fat index (SFI), and visceral fat index (VFI) in non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Consecutive non-metastatic NSCLC patients who underwent radical pulmonary resection at Yunnan Cancer Hospital from January 2013 to December 2018 were analyzed. Preoperative CT-derived SMI, SFI, and VFI at the third lumbar vertebra level (L3) were stratified into sex-specific high and low groups. A composite index was created based on the count of low-value measures among the three indices. Cox regression evaluated associations with overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). A total of 1661 patients (mean age 58.9 ± 9.5 years; 911 men [54.8%] and 750 women [45.2%]) were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 73.97 months (95% CI: 72.80–75.10). Low SMI (HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.16–1.92, p = 0.002), low SFI (HR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.22–1.94, p < 0.001), and low VFI (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.32–2.17, p < 0.001) were associated with poorer OS. The composite index demonstrated poorer OS with an increasing number of low indices (SMI, SFI, and VFI) (p for trend < 0.001): one-low (HR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.16–1.94, p = 0.002), two-low (HR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.29–2.28, p < 0.001), and all-low (HR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.89–4.71, p < 0.001). Similar trend occurred for RFS (all p < 0.05). Preoperative SMI, SFI, and VFI were independently associated with prognosis in patients with NSCLC, and a composite index integrating these measures may provide valuable complementary information for risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: