This research evaluates forecasting architectures for power prediction in photovoltaics, indicating potential for improved efficiency.
Weather variations that affect photovoltaic (PV) generation increase the demand for high temporal resolution power predictions and very short-term forecasts (1 to 30 min) to ensure stability and efficient supply planning. There are several studies based on artificial intelligence (AI), but it is difficult to identify ultra-short- and short-term studies that address the performance evaluation of prediction architectures. Therefore, the strength of this study is its stress test-like design, which compares leading architectures (Transformers, CNN-GRU, Bio-inspired Optimization) under an analysis of accuracy and computational efficiency of PV energy predictions at different ultra-short and short-term time horizons against high-resolution weather variations (every 10 s), providing a solid foundation for future optimization, practical application, and scalability. For a sunny day, the forecasts reached R 2 = 0.9986 and R 2 = 0.9724 on 1-min and 24-h horizons, respectively. For these same time horizons, on a cloudy day, performance decreased by 3.29% and 18.90%, respectively; on a rainy day, the decrease was 7.9% for the 1-min time horizon and 44% for the 12-h time horizon. Likewise, prediction times relative to processing time on sunny days were reduced by 75.38%, 68.95%, 52.83%, and 48.52% for 1-min, 30-min, 3-h, and 12-h horizons, respectively; similar behaviors were observed in the remaining algorithms and day types. • Five algorithms were evaluated for time-based training tests and four for accuracy tests in the prediction of PV power fluctuation with real data with 10-s resolution, under varied weather conditions, for ultra-short and short-term horizons (from 1 min to 24 h). • The best result in evaluation metrics was for the E algorithm, achieving high-precision values of R² for a 1-min time horizon of 0.9986 on a sunny day, 0.9657 on a cloudy day and 0.9194 on a rainy day. • The E algorithm, on a sunny day for the time horizons of 1 min, 30 min, 3 h and 12 h, regarding the processing time, the prediction time was reduced by 75.38%, 68.95%, 52.83% and 48.52%. • Algorithm D, with an accuracy of 99.5% for horizons of less than one hour, shows a reduction in calculation times of 56.18% compared to algorithm E for predictions of photovoltaic power fluctuations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernandez-Fabian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: