OBJECTIVE: To explore healthcare professionals’ beliefs and concerns about doxyPEP by systematically reviewing the literature. METHOD: A systematic review of three bibliographical databases (CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE) and MedRxiv in August 2024, updated in February 2026 explored healthcare professionals’ beliefs and concerns about doxyPEP. Three researchers independently reviewed full-text manuscripts for eligibility and narratively synthesized data. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute toolkit to assess risk of bias. This review was registered on PROSPERO (ID:CRD42024570646). RESULTS: Eight manuscripts were included in the final review: five cross-sectional studies, two qualitative studies, and one mixed method study from the USA (n = 5), Australia (n = 1), Kenya (n = 1), and the UK (n = 1) published between 2020–2025 and including 1840 healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals recognised the high burden of bacterial STIs and believed that doxyPEP should be made available to MSM. There was a strong willingness to provide doxyPEP to MSM with the support of national guidelines. Healthcare professionals suggest that implementing doxyPEP would be feasible with educational support, but were concerned about antimicrobial resistance, drug–drug interactions, pill burden, cost, implementation logistics and the effect on clinical service demands. They acknowledged the lack of research and access to doxyPEP for other groups, specifically trans people and cis-gendered women. They also highlighted the need for community involvement in the implementation of doxyPEP. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights that healthcare professionals were willing and ready to provide doxyPEP; however, they have concerns including antimicrobial resistance, the effect on service capacity, and the lack of research on cis-gendered women and trans people. Patients and health professionals need to be involved in the implementation of doxyPEP.
Spence et al. (2026) studied this question.