PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics0 citationsOpen Access

Alignment among the zygotic cleavage plane, pronuclear axis, and polar axis predicts live birth outcome of blastocyst

View Full Paper
YLYanhe LIUEdith Cowan UniversityKPKelli PeirceJNJay NatalwalaCARE Fertility

Key Points

  • To determine if the alignment of zygotic cleavage plane, pronuclear axis, and polar axis correlates with live birth rates in blastocysts.
  • Retrospective analysis of 241 blastocysts (103 fresh, 138 frozen) from conventional IVF and ICSI.
  • Compared live birth rates based on different alignment classifications (CPPN+/- and CPPB+/-).
  • Used logistic regression to assess the predictability of axis alignment for live birth outcomes.
  • Highest live birth rate (77.5%) found in CPPN+/CPPB+ blastocysts for fresh transfers.
  • For frozen transfers, CPPN+/CPPB+ blastocysts had a live birth rate of 48.3%.
  • Logistic regression confirmed alignment as significant predictors of live birth after adjusting for confounders.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To investigate whether alignment among zygotic cleavage plane (CP), pronuclear (PN) axis, and polar axis (PB) is associated with a higher live birth rate (LBR) in single transferred blastocysts. Methods A total of 103 fresh and 138 frozen blastocysts generated via either conventional IVF insemination or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using fresh autologous oocytes between September 2022 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. LBRs were compared according to alignment among three zygotic axes. The PN axis was defined by the longitudinal axis before fading, and the PB axis was determined by the position of the second polar body. Alignment relative to the zygotic CP was classified as CPPN+ or CPPN- for the PN axis, and CPPB+ or CPPB- for the PB axis. Results In the fresh transfer dataset, the highest LBR was observed in CPPN+/CPPB+ blastocysts (77.5%), compared with CPPN+/CPPB- (20.0%, P < 0.001), CPPN-/CPPB+ (15.2%, P < 0.001), and CPPN-/CPPB- (6.7%, P < 0.001). Similar patterns were observed in the frozen transfer dataset, where CPPN+/CPPB+ blastocysts again had the highest LBR (48.3%), compared with CPPN+/CPPB- (16.1%, P = 0.003), CPPN-/CPPB+ (19.4%, P = 0.007), and CPPN-/CPPB2- (11.1%, P = 0.005). Logistic regression confirmed CPPN and CPPB alignment as independent predictors of live birth in both datasets, after adjusting for several potential confounders. Conclusion Our findings provide preliminary evidence to support zygotic alignment among CP, PN, and PB axes as a potential live birth marker for blastocyst selection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

LIU et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fc7fb39f7826a300d59bhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-026-03847-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper