Nanocarriers improve therapeutic index and selective cytotoxicity of capsaicin in HepG2 cancer cells, indicating core-dependent effects.
Capsaicin is a promising anticancer agent, but its clinical translation is hindered by poor aqueous solubility, low bioavailability, rapid clearance, and dose-limiting irritation, which restrict sustained exposure at tumor sites. Existing formulations only partially overcome these limitations and often lack tumor-microenvironment–responsive release or a clear understanding of how carrier composition modulates biological outcomes. Here, chitosan-coated zinc ferrite (ZFO@CS) and manganese ferrite (MFO@CS) nanocarriers were developed as pH- and glutathione-responsive platforms for capsaicin delivery. The nanocarriers exhibited nanoscale hydrodynamic diameters (~ 120–500 nm) and highly positive zeta potentials (+ 30 to + 50 mV), enabling high encapsulation efficiencies (up to ~ 88%) and colloidal stability. Under physiological pH 7.4, less than 10% of the loaded drug was released over 48 h, whereas ~ 30–40% was liberated under acidic, glutathione-rich conditions mimicking the tumor microenvironment, indicating dual stimulus-triggered behavior. Encapsulation improved capsaicin’s selective cytotoxicity toward HepG2 liver cancer cells, with CAP-MFO@CS achieving a higher therapeutic index than free capsaicin, while maintaining acceptable compatibility with normal WI-38 fibroblasts. The nanocarriers also enhanced antibacterial and antioxidant activities. DNA binding and stopped-flow kinetics revealed that ferrite core composition modulates binding affinity and kinetic stability of DNA–nanocomposite complexes, providing a mechanistic link between material properties and bioactivity. These findings demonstrate that core-dependent design of ferrite–chitosan nanocarriers can improve capsaicin bioavailability, selectivity, and multifunctional therapeutic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakr et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: