Study show moderate-intensity running does not significantly alter Oxyntomodulin levels in healthy adults, suggesting limited influence on appetite regulation.
Oxyntomodulin (OXM) is a gut-derived peptide hormone with anorexigenic properties that reduce food intake and increase energy expenditure. This study investigated the effect of a single bout of moderate-intensity running on OXM concentrations and whether OXM response were associated with appetite perceptions and energy intake. Twenty healthy adults (10 men, 10 women; age: 25 ± 4 years; BMI: 22.2 ± 2.0 kg·m -2 ) completed two randomised crossover trials: (1) 60-minute treadmill running at 70% of peak oxygen uptake, and (2) rest control. Plasma OXM concentrations were measured at baseline (0 min), immediately post-exercise/rest, and every 30 min until 210 min. Appetite ratings were assessed throughout. Energy intake was measured from an ad libitum meal provided at 120 min. Linear mixed-effect models were used to examine the main effect of trial, time, and their interaction. OXM concentrations increased after the meal in both trials ( p < 0.001), with no main effect of trial ( p = 0.413) or trial-by-time interaction ( p = 0.748). Pre-lunch OXM time-averaged incremental area under the curve (iAUC) was higher following exercise compared with control (0–120 min, mean difference = 16 pg·mL -1 ·min, p = 0.006), whereas no difference was observed across the full sampling period (0–210 min; p = 0.265). Exercise increased fullness at 60 min (mean difference = 13 mm, p = 0.019) and reduced relative energy intake compared with control (mean difference = 2056 kJ, p < 0.001). No associations were observed between OXM iAUC and appetite perceptions or energy intake (p ≥ 0.098). Moderate-intensity running did not alter OXM concentrations. Changes in OXM were not associated with appetite perceptions or energy intake, suggesting that OXM may not play a central role in exercise-induced appetite regulation. Research across different exercise modes, intensities, and durations is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: