PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Socioeconomic, physical and mental health impacts of climate change among informal outdoor workers in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol

View Full Paper
SHSylvia HaganKNKate NyhanEDErnest Darkwah

Key Points

  • This review aims to synthesize evidence on the impacts of climate change on informal outdoor workers' health in Sub-Saharan Africa.
  • Conducting a scoping review to gather evidence on socioeconomic and health impacts.
  • Searching multiple databases including Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO.
  • Including studies published in English from 2015 to 2025 with qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method findings.
  • Screening and data extraction performed in duplicate to ensure accuracy.
  • Reporting findings following PRISMA-ScR standards.
  • Identifies distinct vulnerabilities and health impacts faced by informal outdoor workers due to climate change.
  • Describes coping strategies used by workers to mitigate health impacts.
  • Contributes to understanding the role of grey literature in documenting informal sector challenges.

Abstract

The informal economy plays a critical role in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), yet informal outdoor workers are disproportionately exposed to climate-related hazards. Existing reviews often merge formal and informal workers, limiting insight into the distinct vulnerabilities and outcomes experienced in informal outdoor work. This proposed scoping review seeks to synthesise evidence on the socioeconomic, physical, and mental health impacts and coping strategies of climate change among informal outdoor workers in SSA. We will search Medline, Global Health, Embase, Scopus, Lens, PsycINFO, Business Source Complete, African Journals Online (AJOL), and Africa Index Medicus, alongside grey literature searching and citation tracking. We will include primary studies published in English (2015–2025) reporting qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method findings. Screening and extraction will be conducted in duplicate, with discrepancies resolved by team members. Findings will be reported following PRISMA-ScR and synthesised narratively and thematically. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences, and webinars.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hagan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b5ff6e83145bc643d1bf48https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344943
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper