PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Case Studies in Thermal Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Dual Reciprocity Boundary Element Method analysis of MHD Brinkman–Rivlin–Ericksen viscoelastic flow past cylindrical obstacles in porous microchannel

View Full Paper
KCKowsalya C.Vellore Institute of Technology UniversityPSPankaj ShuklaVellore Institute of Technology University

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the effects of viscoelastic and magnetic interactions on flow in porous microchannels.
  • Utilized Dual Reciprocity Boundary Element Method for analysis.
  • Incorporated governing equations in a stream function-vorticity formulation.
  • Considered effects of Deborah number, Hartmann number, and Darcy number on flow dynamics.
  • Increasing Hartmann number suppresses vortical motion.
  • Higher Deborah number enhances flow dynamics.
  • Findings contribute to understanding blood flow interactions in biomedical contexts.

Abstract

This investigation is motivated by the dynamics of blood flow, particularly its interaction with clots and drug carriers within vessels. The study focuses on the magnetohydrodynamic Brinkman flow of a Rivlin–Ericksen viscoelastic fluid through a porous microchannel embedded with an array of cylindrical obstacles. The governing equations are expressed in a stream function-vorticity formulation, where viscoelasticity is incorporated through the first-order Rivlin–Ericksen tensor and magnetic influences are represented by a Lorentz force term. The modified vorticity transport equation includes nonlinear contributions associated with the Deborah number (De) to account for elastic effects, the Hartmann number (Ha) to capture magnetic field strength, and porous resistance defined by the Darcy number (Da) and slip length (ls). A Beavers–Joseph condition is imposed at the porous-fluid interface to describe interfacial momentum transfer. The Dual Reciprocity Boundary Element Method (DRBEM) is employed for solving the resulting boundary integral equations, enabling efficiency in complex geometries. Numerical experiments reveal that increasing Ha suppresses vortical motion, whereas higher De enhances it, underscoring the competing effects of magnetic damping and viscoelastic amplification. The framework provides valuable insights for microfluidic design, artificial organs, and biomedical applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

C. et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b6068883145bc643d1c6eehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2026.107933
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper