PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Journal of the Korean society for quality management0 citationsOpen Access

Enablers and Inhibitors of Generative AI Usage Intentions in Work Environments

View Full Paper
JPJunSung ParkHPHeejun Park

Key Points

  • Explore factors affecting the adoption of Generative AI in workplaces, identifying enablers and inhibitors.
  • Survey conducted with 192 participants experienced in Generative AI using MTurk
  • Data analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) for validity and reliability
  • Employing attention-check questions to ensure data quality
  • Knowledge support and entertainment significantly boost intentions for Generative AI adoption
  • Realistic threat emerges as a substantial barrier to adoption
  • Customization, perceived risk, and identity threat showed no significant impact on adoption intentions

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the adoption of Generative AI in the workplace, focusing on both enablers and inhibitors. By employing the dual factor theory, this research examines how knowledge support, customization, entertainment, perceived risk, realistic threat, and identity threat impact the intention to adopt Generative AI technologies such as ChatGPT.Methods: Data were collected from 192 participants via MTurk, all of whom had experience using Generative AI. The survey was conducted in June 2024, and the data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to ensure the validity and reliability of the measurement model. Attention-check questions were used to ensure data quality, and participants provided demographic information at the end of the survey.Results: : The findings reveal that knowledge support and entertainment significantly enhance the intention to adopt Generative AI, whereas realistic threat poses a substantial barrier. Customization, perceived risk, and identity threat did not significantly affect adoption intentions.Conclusion: This study contributes to the literature by addressing the gap in understanding the adoption mechanisms of Generative AI in professional settings. It highlights the importance of promoting AI's knowledge support and entertainment capabilities while addressing employees' concerns about job security. Organizations should emphasize these benefits and proactively mitigate perceived threats to foster a positive reception of Generative AI technologies. The findings offer practical implications for enhancing user acceptance and provide a foundation for future research in this area.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Park et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b6068883145bc643d1c891https://doi.org/10.7469/jksqm.2024.52.3.509
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ChatGPT usage in everyday life: A motivation-theoretic mixed-methods study2024 · 68 citations
  2. 2SustAInable Employability: Sustainable Employability in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence2024 · 17 citations
  3. 3Effects of the User Perception on Symbolic Adoption and Usage in Mandatory ATCIS-ǁ Use2022 · 1 citations
  4. 4Inhibitors and Enablers as Dual Factor Concepts in Technology Usage2004 · 388 citations
  5. 5Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators2023 · 1,111 citations