Demonstrates improved data structuring using open source Optical Character Recognition for military test reports, suggesting benefits for defense quality management.
Purpose: This study aims to transform test reports in the defense industry into a structured database (DB) by leveraging open-source Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and following the DMADOV methodology for quality improvement.Methods: The research was conducted in two phases following the DMADOV procedure. First, a baseline system was developed using the open-source OCR engine Tesseract to create a text extraction program, with data structuring attempted via rule-based post-processing. Subsequently, to overcome the system's limitations, a multi-model pipeline, specifically PaddleOCR's PP-Structure, was applied to enhance structural recognition performance, including layout analysis and table recognition. The performance of both systems was comparatively verified through quantitative metrics and qualitative analysis.Results: The initial Tesseract-based model heavily relied on strict, rule-based post-processing to ultimately achieve a 100% data match rate, but this revealed the system's lack of scalability and flexibility. In contrast, the optimized system using the multi-model pipeline (PP-Structure) accurately recognized the document's structure and content without requiring separate, complex post-processing, demonstrating superior performance in both qualitative and quantitative aspects.Conclusion: This study clearly identified the limitations of a simple OCR engine and demonstrated that a multi-model pipeline is an effective alternative for the automated structuring of defense quality data. The findings provide a practical roadmap for system integration companies and their partners to build a big data-based quality information system. Furthermore, the study is significant in its proposal of data utilization strategies for the implementation of Defense Quality 4.0.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: