PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Resilience Assessment of Traditional Villages Based on Cultural Ecosystem Services—An Empirical Study of the Zuojiang Huashan Rock Art World Heritage Area in China

View Full Paper
YLYong Sook LuLHL. HasnanBTBor Tsong Teh

Key Points

  • This research examines the balance between preserving ancient villages and their development under World Heritage guidelines.
  • Constructed a checklist based on resilience theory and cultural ecosystem services
  • Conducted field investigations in the Zuojiang Huashan Rock Art Heritage Area
  • Administered short questionnaires and two rounds of Delphi surveys
  • Cultural ecosystem services are vital for the social–ecological resilience of villages
  • Resilience scores vary significantly across villages
  • High-resilience villages exhibit diverse cultural services and strong community ties

Abstract

In this study, we explore how to balance the preservation of the original appearance of ancient villages with their development within the framework of World Heritage protection. We applied resilience theory and constructed a simple checklist, taking cultural ecosystem services into consideration, and selected the Zuojiang Huashan Rock Art Heritage Area in China for field investigation, as well as conducted in-depth interviews, the distribution of short questionnaires, and two rounds of Delphi surveys. This comprehensive approach enabled us to discover the key cultural ecosystem services that villagers rely on for their livelihoods. Then, we tracked how these services enhanced buffering capacity, helped people self-organize, and promoted adaptive learning. The results show that cultural ecosystem services constitute the core framework of the social–ecological resilience of the villages. The quantity and combination of the services directly determine the resilience score, and the resilience of villages within the heritage area shows significant spatial differentiation. High-resilience villages have diverse and mutually reinforcing cultural ecosystem services and local community rules, while low-resilience villages face service loss, weakened social connections, and single development options. Through this study, we aim to further enrich the cultural connotation of resilience theory, provide a practical assessment tool for practitioners of the method, and offer practical guidance and suggestions for transforming heritage protection from static protection to a dynamic, vibrant system that promotes vitality and resilience in practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b606af83145bc643d1cdf7https://doi.org/10.3390/su18062845
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evolutionary Characteristics, Improvement Strategies and Driving Mechanisms of the Human Settlement Environment in Chinese Traditional Villages Based on Historical Hydrological Resilience Assessment2025 · 3 citations
  2. 2Evolutionary Characteristics, Improvement Strategies and Driving Mechanisms of the Human Settlement Environment in Chinese Traditional Villages Based on Historical Hydrological Resilience Assessment2025
  3. 3Cultural landscape resilience evaluation of Great Wall Villages: A case study of three villages in Chicheng County2024 · 8 citations
  4. 4To Evaluate the Value of Traditional Village Landscape Elements in Influencing the Huizhou Character of the UNESCO World Heritage Site: A Case Study of Huizhou, Anhui, China2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5Fire-Prevention-Oriented Environmental Design and Governance: A Case Study Focusing on Vernacular Residential World Heritage Sites2026