Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel proof finds no thick spherical buildings H_3 and H_4, indicating the importance of the Moufang property.
We present a novel proof for the fact that thick spherical buildings of types H₃ H 3 and H₄ H 4 do not exist. For that, we first provide an elementary axiom system for Lie incidence geometries associated with buildings of type H₃ H 3 . This way, we can write our arguments purely in the language of point-line geometries, not needing the theory of buildings. Assuming the existence of thick spherical buildings of type H₃ H 3 , we construct nontrivial root elations of generalized pentagons contained within them. This leads to a contradiction with Tits’s result on the nonexistence of Moufang generalized pentagons. Consequently, we obtain a new, direct, and geometric proof for the nonexistence of thick spherical buildings of types H₃ H 3 and H₄ H 4 , without invoking Tits’s extension theorem. Together with similar geometric constructions of the author for root elations of buildings of types Bₙ B n and Cₙ C n , and known constructions for buildings of type Aₙ A n , this yields an alternative, elementary proof for the fact that all thick irreducible spherical buildings of rank 3 have the Moufang property, not using Tits’s extension theorem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sira Busch (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: