PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

A selective machine learning algorithm for severe periodontitis labeling from questionnaire data

View Full Paper
ESE. StamatelouNNNina NijlandNSNaichuan Su

Key Points

  • To develop a machine learning pipeline that labels severe periodontitis using self-reported oral health data.
  • Utilized three datasets of self-reported oral health questionnaires and CPITN scores.
  • Developed a two-stage machine learning pipeline with CatBoost for predicting periodontitis.
  • Evaluated model performance with tenfold cross-validation and internal test sets.
  • Achieved complete separation of severe periodontitis and no periodontitis in high-confidence predictions.
  • Identified 4.31% of eligible cases correctly without misclassifying moderate periodontitis.

Abstract

Epidemiological cohorts often collect self-reported oral health (SROH) questionnaires but lack clinical periodontal measurements. We developed a selective, explainable machine learning (ML) pipeline that can assign labels for severe periodontitis (SP) or no periodontitis (NP). Three datasets (n = 498) with SROH questionnaires, demographics, and Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN) scores were used to derive NP, moderate periodontitis (MP), and SP categories. MP cases were excluded from model development. After cleaning and feature engineering, non-similar label duplicates were removed. A CatBoost model (Separator-A) was trained with tenfold cross-validation; NP/SP predictions were retained when probability ≥ 0.85. From these outputs and domain rules, a rule-consistent subset was created to train a second model (Separator-Z). Performance was evaluated on internal test and hold-out inference sets. Next, the pipeline was applied to MP cases. The pipeline achieved complete separation across all evaluation sets within the retained high-confidence subset, which represented 4.31% of eligible NP/SP cases, while no MP cases were misclassified as NP or SP. Thus, a two-stage, explainable ML pipeline can selectively identify SP and NP from SROH questionnaire data, supporting case–control selection in cohorts without clinical periodontal examinations, though validation is warranted to confirm generalizability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stamatelou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b606d583145bc643d1d39chttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43934-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper