PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Geophysical Journal International2 citationsOpen Access

Machine Learning for Seismic Low-Frequency Extrapolation

View Full Paper
RHRohin HarikumarSMSusan Minkoff

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve seismic inversion accuracy by synthesizing low-frequency content from high-frequency seismic data using machine learning models.
  • Assess three non-GPU machine learning models: random forest, Gaussian process regression, and gradient boosting.
  • Evaluate models on synthetic datasets and real data from the Northwest Shelf of Australia.
  • Compare the performance of tree-based models with convolutional neural networks for low-frequency extrapolation.
  • Deep learning models improve low-frequency extrapolation but require GPU hardware.
  • Tree-based ML models outperform CNNs in accuracy and computational cost on non-GPU architectures.
  • FWI applied to extrapolated data shows consistent accuracy improvements over original datasets without low frequencies.

Abstract

Summary The cycle-skipping problem that plagues full waveform inversion (FWI) can be at least partially mitigated if low frequencies (which encode the kinematics of wave propagation in seismic data) are recorded. However, seismic sources and receivers are band-limited, so seismic data doesn’t generally include signals down to 0 Hz. To improve our ability to solve the seismic inverse problem, one can synthesize this missing low-frequency (LF) content from the recorded high-frequency (HF) data using machine learning (ML) models. Deep learning models such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) demonstrate impressive ability to perform low frequency extrapolation. However, such models require powerful hardware (GPU machines) and careful training. We assess the extrapolation capabilities of three different ML models that do not require GPU machines, namely, random forest, Gaussian process regression, and gradient boosting, on both synthetic and real data. Experimental results on two synthetic datasets (generated from a low velocity lens embedded in a homogeneous medium, and the Marmousi model) demonstrate that FWI applied to the extrapolated data consistently improves inversion accuracy relative to FWI applied to the original datasets that do not contain low frequencies. Application of low-frequency extrapolation to real data from the Northwest Shelf of Australia demonstrates that tree-based ML models such as gradient boosting can outperform CNNs in terms of both accuracy and computational cost on non-GPU architectures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harikumar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b606d583145bc643d1d3c5https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggag100
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper