Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Design science approach enhances security controls and regulatory obligations in SMEs, facilitating transparent negotiations and interorganizational relationships.
Small-and-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) increasingly depend on business partnerships to access markets and scale operations, yet they often face trust barriers during contract formation due to the complexity of the verification of their cybersecurity posture and compliance status by their partners. This problem is intensified by rising regulatory expectations, notably the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), which many SMEs struggle to interpret and operationalize under constraints of budget, skills, and fragmented responsibilities. This study adopts a Design Science Research approach to blueprint and evaluate a lightweight mapping framework that links commonly implemented security controls to CRA requirements and to widely recognized benchmarks (ISO/IEC 27001 and CIS). Grounded in Institutional Theory and Socio-Technical Systems Theory, the artefact translates regulatory obligations into actionable, evidence-backed controls and produces partner-facing outputs that support transparency in negotiations and service level agreements. The framework is iteratively co-created with a multidisciplinary expert community. Expected contributions include a practical mechanism for making cybersecurity maturity visible, accelerating partnership formation, and enabling sustainable interorganizational relationships while remaining feasible for resource-constrained SMEs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Conceição et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: