PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Parkinsonism & Related Disorders3 citationsOpen Access

Deep Brain Stimulation in the Middle East: First UAE Experience Comparing Subthalamic and Pallidal Targets for Parkinson’s disease

SMShivam Om MittalFRFlorian RöserMTM Thomas

Key Points

  • To compare outcomes of deep brain stimulation targeting the subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus internus in patients with Parkinson's disease in the UAE.
  • Retrospective review of 50 patients undergoing bilateral DBS (37 STN, 13 GPi) from 2020 to 2025.
  • Collected data on demographics, clinical phenotype, LEDD, UPDRS-III scores, and adverse events.
  • Summarized outcomes by DBS target with exploratory comparisons.
  • GPi patients had earlier motor symptoms and universal dyskinesias; STN candidates had more heterogeneous phenotypes.
  • Both targets significantly reduced LEDD (STN 49.9%, GPi 37.5%).
  • Mean OFF-med to DBS-ON UPDRS-III improvement exceeded 80% for both targets.

Abstract

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) is an established therapy for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD).However, comparative outcome data from the Middle East are limited, and it remains unclear whether target-specific differences reported in randomized trials translate to regional realworld practice.We report outcomes of STN and GPi DBS from a single tertiary center in the United Arab Emirates.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 50 consecutive patients with PD who underwent bilateral STN or GPi DBS between 2020 and 2025 (37 STN, 13 GPi).Demographics, clinical phenotype, levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS-III) scores, and adverse events were collected.Outcomes were summarized by target, with exploratory comparisons acknowledging baseline heterogeneity and limited statistical power.Results: GPi patients had earlier motor symptom onset and universal dyskinesias, while STN candidates demonstrated more heterogeneous phenotypes.Both targets were associated with substantial LEDD reduction (STN 49.9% 32.4; GPi 37.5% 22.0).Variability and unequal sample sizes limited definitive target comparisons.Mean OFF-medication to DBS-ON UPDRS-III improvement exceeded 80% for both targets, likely influenced by high levodopa responsiveness, non-blinded assessments, and variable postoperative timing.Conclusions: In this first institutional comparative DBS analysis from the UAE, both STN and GPi DBS produced meaningful medication reduction and robust motor improvement, demonstrating that outcomes comparable to landmark trials are achievable within an J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f emerging Middle Eastern neuromodulation program.Methodological limitations preclude conclusions on target superiority and underscore the need for larger prospective regional studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mittal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b64c67b42794e3e660dbffhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2026.108271
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis2024 · 15 citations
  2. 2A Comprehensive Review of Brain Connectomics and Imaging to Improve Deep Brain Stimulation Outcomes2020 · 62 citations
  3. 3Parkinson's disease in the MENASA countries2020 · 22 citations
  4. 4The Core Assessment Program for Surgical Interventional Therapies in Parkinson's Disease (CAPSIT‐PD): Tolerability of Preoperative Neuropsychological Testing for Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease2015 · 10 citations
  5. 5Basic Tips: How Do I Start Programming Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease Patients?2021 · 11 citations