PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Continent and Life Evolution0 citations

Surface subsidence patterns and mechanisms of underlying goaf beneath a railway tunnel

View Full Paper
HMHaining MaTGTianfeng GuBCBo Cui

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand the ongoing surface subsidence above an abandoned mine goaf affecting railway infrastructure.
  • Combined InSAR time-series data from 2015 to 2024 for monitoring surface movement
  • Conducted numerical modelling to simulate subsidence phenomena
  • Applied probability-integral analysis to forecast future settlements
  • Subsidence is accelerating more than a decade after mining ceased
  • Identified five stages of subsidence evolution
  • Forecasting indicates continued settlement for approximately ten more years

Abstract

Long-term deformation of abandoned mine workings endangers surface infrastructure, causing wall cracking, beam–column distortion and, in extreme cases, tilting or collapse. Here we track surface movement above the Taoping tunnel goaf beneath the Houyue railway (Shanxi, China) by combining 2015–2024 InSAR time-series, numerical modelling and probability-integral analysis. Contrary to widely held stability assumptions, subsidence is still accelerating more than a decade after extraction ceased. Five evolutionary stages are identified: (1) initial roof failure and local basin formation; (2) stress redistribution that loads the safety coal pillar; (3) progressive pillar crushing; (4) merger of adjacent goafs into a “balanced” instability structure; and (5) transformation of the local basin into a regional trough. Probability-integral forecasting indicates residual settlement will continue for roughly ten years before stabilization. The proposed stage-based framework enables long-term stability assessment and targeted remediation of similar legacy goafs, and supports safe railway operation and future land reuse.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b64c9ab42794e3e660dcbdhttps://doi.org/10.55092/cle20260003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper