Experimental study investigates how specimen length affects post-peak behaviour in different rock types, suggesting implications for rock mechanics.
Whether the post-peak behaviour of rock is a characteristic is currently a matter of debate. One of the debatable issues is whether specimen length affects post-peak behaviour. To investigate the effect of specimen length on post-peak behaviour, a series of laboratory tests were conducted in parallel at three laboratories. Each laboratory tested at least two rock types: a soft and weak rock (Class I) and a hard and strong rock (Class II). The length-to-diameter (L/D) ratios of the specimens were 1, 2.5, and 4. The radial strain was measured using a Linear Variable Differential Transducer (LVDT) placed around the specimen at mid-height. The axial strain was measured over a fixed gauge length in one laboratory, whereas it was measured over the entire specimen length in the other two laboratories. The test results showed that when the L/D ratio increased from 2.5 to 4, the post-peak stress–strain curve of the specimens remained unchanged when the gauge length was fixed on the specimen; however, it became dependent on specimen length when the measurement was taken over the entire specimen length. A computational algorithm was developed to explore the relationship between the post-peak behaviour of rock and energy conversion. The results indicate that the post-peak stress–strain curve reflects the characteristic behaviour of rock when the specimen L/D ratio is equal to or greater than 2.5 and the strains are measured within the fracture zone. • The post-peak stress–strain curve is a characteristic behaviour when the axial strain is measured in the fracture zone. • The PPB is influenced by the L/D ratio when the axial strain is measured over the entire specimen length. • An algorithm was developed to calculate the PPB by accounting for energy conversion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: