PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Energy and Buildings2 citationsOpen Access

District-scale life cycle costing of climate-neutral retrofits, based on automatic envelope detection workflows and LOD3 3D city model

View Full Paper
ASAnthony Robert SuppaMBMarta BotteroVCVincenzo Corrado

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the financial and environmental impacts of climate-neutral building retrofits using advanced detection techniques.
  • Utilized LOD3 for life cycle costing based on energy modeling.
  • Extracted building dimensions using urban sensing and AI.
  • Modeled 80 retrofit scenarios with various deployment rates and emission factors.
  • Analyzed cost impacts and emission reductions linked to retrofit packages.
  • Investment costs for retrofits ranged from €13,723 to €27,272 per dwelling.
  • Combining envelope retrofits with heat pumps led to significant emission reductions.
  • Accelerating retrofit deployment yielded 1%-18% lower cumulative discounted cash flow.
  • Retrofitting a gross floor area of 1.4 million m² under faster scenarios showed improved energy savings.

Abstract

Policymakers guiding the decarbonization transition must make decisions around energy and CO 2 reductions that are linked to financial expenditures. This study supports decision-making in the buildings sector by combining urban building energy modeling and life cycle costing (LCC) for district-scale retrofit scenarios. The LCC is completed at level of detail (LOD) 3, enriched with exterior wall, roof, and window areas extracted from advanced urban sensing and artificial intelligence techniques. In a case district of 1,291 residential buildings in Turin, Italy, detected envelope quantities are applied to unit costs, resulting in investment costs of €13,723 to €27,272 per dwelling, significantly higher than budgeted for the EU mission 100 Climate-Neutral Cities. A total of 80 scenarios are modeled, including 10 retrofit packages under two scenarios for roof renovation (with and without occupied attics), and with four deployment scenarios to modulate retrofit rates and emission factors in the electricity supply. The research shows complex outcomes under different deployment scenarios, though packages combining envelope retrofits with high-temperature heat pumps consistently result in the greatest emission reductions and lowest cumulative discounted cash flow (CDCF) per quantity of CO 2 saved. For six packages, accelerating retrofit deployment led to 1%-18% lower CDCF, as energy savings offset investment costs over 30 years, even though a gross floor area of 1.4 million m 2 is retrofitted, compared to 855,000 m 2 under slower deployment scenarios. The value of the work is to prove the use of automatic detection techniques in urban-scale LCC, and to provide decision support tools to policymakers guiding the rapid transition to climate neutrality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suppa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b64d48b42794e3e660e0adhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.117289
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper