Key result
Family stress linked to ~247% higher odds of depression.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate cross-sectional associations of multidimensional psychosocial stress and body mass index with depression risk.
Does exposure to multidimensional psychosocial stress and varying BMI affect the risk of depression in a general cohort?
Cross-Sectional (n=222)
No
Does exposure to multidimensional psychosocial stress and varying BMI affect the risk of depression in a general cohort?
Effect estimate: OR 3.47 (95% CI 1.96-6.15)
p-value: p=<0.001
Family, academic, and interpersonal stress are independently associated with higher depression risk, while higher BMI showed a counterintuitive inverse association that requires further investigation regarding medication confounders.
May support depression screening in high family stress; extends psychosocial risk evidence but leaves inverse BMI association open to study.
Objective This study aimed to investigate the cross-sectional associations of multidimensional psychosocial stress and body mass index (BMI) with depression risk. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 222 participants (123 with depression, 99 controls) completed questionnaires assessing depression (BDI-II), six domains of psychosocial stress (family, work, financial, academic, interpersonal, emotional), BMI, and lifestyle factors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine independent associations, with exploratory subgroup analyses by age and gender. Results Multivariate analysis indicates that, family stress (OR = 3.47, 95% CI: 1.96–6.15), academic stress (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.14–3.38), and interpersonal stress (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.36–4.03) were independently associated with higher odds of depression. Higher BMI was associated with lower odds of depression (OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85–0.96); however, this inverse association may be confounded by unmeasured factors such as antidepressant use and should be interpreted cautiously. An extreme association with alcohol abstinence (OR = 0.05) was based on a very small subgroup ( n = 14) and requires cautious interpretation. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested variations in these associations. Conclusion Specific psychosocial stressors are associated with depression risk in this sample. The counterintuitive finding regarding BMI warrants investigation in studies controlling for medication use. The subgroup findings are preliminary and require replication in larger cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Depression (n=222). Family stress was associated with a 3.47-fold higher odds of depression compared to no family stress in individuals, with a 95% CI of 1.96 to 6.15.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: