Family stress was associated with a 3.47-fold higher odds of depression compared to no family stress in individuals, with a 95% CI of 1.96 to 6.15.
Cross-Sectional (n=222)
No
Does exposure to multidimensional psychosocial stress and varying BMI affect the risk of depression in a general cohort?
222 participants (123 with depression, 99 controls), mean age 22.91, 66.22% female, based in China. Key inclusion: BDI-II score ≥ 14 for depression group, BDI-II score < 14 and no history of depression for control group.
Exposure to multidimensional psychosocial stress (family, work, financial, academic, interpersonal, emotional) and varying Body Mass Index (BMI)
Absence of specific psychosocial stressors and lower Body Mass Index (BMI)
Depression risk assessed via Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) score ≥ 14patient reported
Family, academic, and interpersonal stress are independently associated with higher depression risk, while higher BMI showed a counterintuitive inverse association that requires further investigation regarding medication confounders.
Effect estimate: OR 3.47 (95% CI 1.96-6.15)
p-value: p=<0.001
Objective This study aimed to investigate the cross-sectional associations of multidimensional psychosocial stress and body mass index (BMI) with depression risk. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 222 participants (123 with depression, 99 controls) completed questionnaires assessing depression (BDI-II), six domains of psychosocial stress (family, work, financial, academic, interpersonal, emotional), BMI, and lifestyle factors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine independent associations, with exploratory subgroup analyses by age and gender. Results Multivariate analysis indicates that, family stress (OR = 3.47, 95% CI: 1.96–6.15), academic stress (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.14–3.38), and interpersonal stress (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.36–4.03) were independently associated with higher odds of depression. Higher BMI was associated with lower odds of depression (OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85–0.96); however, this inverse association may be confounded by unmeasured factors such as antidepressant use and should be interpreted cautiously. An extreme association with alcohol abstinence (OR = 0.05) was based on a very small subgroup ( n = 14) and requires cautious interpretation. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested variations in these associations. Conclusion Specific psychosocial stressors are associated with depression risk in this sample. The counterintuitive finding regarding BMI warrants investigation in studies controlling for medication use. The subgroup findings are preliminary and require replication in larger cohorts.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lu Han
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
Xi Chen
South China Agricultural University
Xinyu Li
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Han et al. (Thu,) conducted a cross-sectional in Depression (n=222). Family stress was associated with a 3.47-fold higher odds of depression compared to no family stress in individuals, with a 95% CI of 1.96 to 6.15.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79d538166e15b153aabfe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2026.1786960
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: