PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2026Banks and Bank Systems2 citationsOpen Access

The impact of board governance effectiveness on carbon disclosure in the banking sector

MMMarwan MansourAAAla Hussein AlbawwatAMAhmad Marei

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how effective board governance influences carbon emission disclosure in banks.
  • Analyzed listed commercial banks in six ASEAN countries from 2014 to 2023.
  • Utilized panel data analysis employing fixed-effects and Tobit regression models.
  • Investigated the relationship between board effectiveness and carbon disclosure levels.
  • Board governance effectiveness significantly improves carbon emission disclosure scores.
  • A one-point increase in Board Effectiveness Score leads to an increase of 2.630 units in disclosure under fixed-effects model.
  • Results show strong explanatory power with within R-squared at 23.5% for fixed-effects and pseudo R-squared at 55% for Tobit model.

Abstract

Type of the article: Research ArticleAbstractClimate-related risks have intensified the demand for transparency in the banking sector, particularly with respect to carbon-related information disclosed to stakeholders. In emerging economies, where climate disclosure remains largely voluntary, internal governance mechanisms are expected to play a decisive role in shaping reporting practices. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between board governance effectiveness and carbon emission disclosure in the ASEAN banking sector. The object of the study is listed commercial banks operating in six ASEAN countries over the period 2014–2023. The analysis is based on panel data and employs fixed-effects and Tobit regression models to account for unobserved heterogeneity and the bounded nature of disclosure scores. The results indicate that board governance effectiveness is positively and statistically associated with carbon emission disclosure. Accordingly, the within R-squared value for the fixed-effects model is 23.5%, while the pseudo R-squared for the Tobit model is 55%, indicating strong explanatory power of both specifications. Economically, a one-point increase in the Board Effectiveness Score corresponds to an increase of 2.630 units in carbon emission disclosure in the fixed-effects model and 4.550 units in the Tobit specification, indicating economically meaningful improvements in disclosure intensity. In addition, bank size, age, profitability, and eco-innovation activity are found to be positively related to disclosure levels. The results remain robust across alternative specifications, including panel quantile regression, panel logit estimation, and two-step system generalized method of moments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mansour et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79d538166e15b153aac71https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.21(1).2026.08
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper