PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting early rupture and rebleeding risk after intracranial aneurysm embolization

PDPu DuFYFen YuGCGuohao Chen

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop and validate a nomogram that predicts early rupture and rebleeding risk after intracranial aneurysm embolization.
  • Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 274 patients
  • Divided data into training set (n=192) and validation set (n=82)
  • Utilized univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify independent risk factors
  • Evaluated nomogram performance using ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis
  • Identified independent risk factors: larger aneurysm diameter, wider neck, higher preoperative Hunt-Hess grade, incomplete embolization, poor postoperative blood pressure control
  • Nomogram showed good calibration with C-index values of 0.873 (training) and 0.738 (validation)
  • ROC Curve areas under the curve were 0.870 for training and 0.739 for validation, indicating strong predictive performance
  • Clinical utility indicated within specific threshold probability ranges

Abstract

Objective To construct and validate a nomogram for predicting early rupture rebleeding risk after intracranial aneurysm embolization, providing a precise clinical assessment tool. Methods Clinical data from 274 patients (March 2022–February 2025) were retrospectively analyzed, divided into a training set ( n = 192) and validation set ( n = 82) (7:3 ratio). Univariate/multivariate logistic regression identified independent risk factors. The nomogram’s performance was evaluated via ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCA. Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that larger aneurysm diameter, wider neck, higher preoperative Hunt-Hess grade, incomplete embolization, and poor postoperative blood pressure control were independent risk factors for early rupture rebleeding after embolization (all p 0.05). The constructed nomogram demonstrated good calibration and discriminative ability in both the training and validation sets, with C-index values of 0.873 and 0.738, respectively. The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were 0.870 (95%CI: 0.790–0.951) and 0.739 (95%CI: 0.456–1.000) with corresponding sensitivities and specificities of 0.812, 0.840 and 0.667, 0.902, respectively. Decision curve analysis indicated significant clinical utility within specific threshold probability ranges. Conclusion The multifactor nomogram exhibits strong predictive performance, facilitating early identification of high-risk patients and personalized treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Du et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79da78166e15b153aada1https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1727678
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper