Research demonstrates effective shoreline debris monitoring design in the U.S., suggesting improved management value.
Few marine debris monitoring programs have explicitly applied statistical methods in their design, limiting data value and applicability. Here, we describe the NOAA Marine Debris Program's strategy for designing a scientifically robust monitoring survey in the United States to estimate shoreline debris status and trends. Key principles of experimental design are emphasized and applied across four phases: frame, design, monitor, implement and learn. Informed by a power analysis with spatially balanced site selection, the design includes 62 sites in each of 10 regions; 12 sites visited annually with quarterly replication and 50 sites visited once every five years (no within year replication), yielding reliable estimates of annual status and declining trends of 25% to 50% over an 11-year duration. This design may not be directly transferable, the underlying methodology can be tailored to suit alternative contexts. Practitioners should consider monitoring as a rigorous scientific endeavor to improve management value. • Effective shoreline marine debris monitoring programs should be question-driven. • NOAA's new nationwide design balances statistical power and operational feasibility. • Power analysis and GRTS informed a spatially balanced, 620-site, 11-year design. • A regionally stratified approach improves data for guiding management decisions. • Short and long-term outcomes allow for early, meaningful, return on investment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uhrin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: