PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2026Physica Scripta0 citationsOpen Access

Nano enhanced GFRP composites: A comparative assessment of graphene and halloysite additives under low-velocity impact loading

View Full Paper
EKErtan KösedağBEBaran Erkek

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the impact behavior of glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites with different nano additives.
  • Fabricated unfilled, graphene filled, and halloysite filled GFRP composites using ultrasonic-assisted dispersion.
  • Tested samples using a drop weight impact system to measure peak contact force and energy absorption.
  • Analyzed performance differences between graphene and halloysite nanotubes at varying weight percentages.
  • Graphene filled composites increased peak contact force, especially at 1 wt.%.
  • 1.5 wt.% graphene reduced maximum force due to excessive filler content.
  • HNT filled composites exhibited better damage tolerance and energy dissipation mechanisms.

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the effects of graphene nanoplatelets and halloysite nanotubes on the low-velocity impact behavior of glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites manufactured via ultrasonic-assisted dispersion and vacuum infusion. Unfilled, graphene filled (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 wt.%), and halloysite nanotube filled (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 wt.%) composites were fabricated and tested using a drop weight impact system to assess their peak contact force, deformation response, and overall energy absorption characteristics. Graphene reinforced samples exhibited a substantial increase in peak contact force, particularly at 1 wt.%, indicating enhanced stiffness and load transfer due to the high aspect ratio and superior intrinsic strength of graphene. However, the 1.5 wt.% graphene specimens showed a reduction in maximum force. In contrast, Halloysite nanotube filled composites displayed a more progressive and ductile response. The 1 wt.% HNT sample achieved the best balance between load bearing capacity and displacement, demonstrating improved energy dissipation through micro crack deflection, crack bridging, and nanotube pull-out mechanisms. Microscobic analyses confirm that graphene is more effective for increasing peak load, whereas halloysite nanotubes provide superior impact resilience and damage tolerance. Overall, low nano filler loadings (0.5-1 wt.%) significantly enhanced the impact performance of polymer based composites, while excessive filler content led to dispersion-related performance losses.Highlights• Graphene and HNTs were used to nano-reinforce GFRP laminates.• Ultrasonic mixing and vacuum infusion enabled high-quality laminates.• Graphene and HNT impact responses were directly compared.• Graphene improved peak impact force and energy absorption.• HNTs increased damage tolerance by distributing deformation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kösedağ et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79dce8166e15b153ab096https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ae51c9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper