Comparative analysis reveals variable-rate potassium fertilization enhances yields in low-testing soils, suggesting efficient nutrient management.
Variable‐rate (VR) technology allows for changing nutrient rates within fields. This study compared VR and uniform‐rate (UR) potassium (K) fertilization for corn ( Zea mays L.)–soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotations. Grid soil‐sampling (0.1–0.3 ha cells), global positioning systems (GPS), and yield monitors were used to establish multiyear strip trials on eight Iowa fields (29 site‐years). Treatments were a control and K for the 2‐year rotation applied once before corn or soybean using UR or VR based on soil‐test K (STK). Strip‐mean yields showed increases ( p ≤ 0.10) in 15 site‐years, but the application methods differed only in two. Potassium increased yield in 39 of 60 instances with STK Very Low, Low, or Optimum (<171 mg kg −1 ), but in three of 23 instances with higher STK. The application method did not influence yield response to K consistently in analyses by site but on average across sites and crops, VR increased yield 3.2% more than UR with Very Low STK (<91 mg kg −1 ). Across all site‐years, VR applied 17% less K than UR and increased STK of low‐testing soils (<130 mg kg −1 ) 40% more than UR, with inconsistent effects in high‐testing soils, which represents cost savings and increased K use efficiency. We conclude that the K application methods seldom differed, but on average across fields, reduced the amount of K applied and increased STK of low‐testing areas more than UR. Results contribute to farmers’ understanding about the potential advantages of VR for K management but also its limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pagani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: