This research validates fact extraction in open data using multiple identifiers, highlighting implications for accountability.
Paper 4 in the Prioris research series. Validates fact-level edge extraction using seven Dutch canonical identifier types (BIG, ECLI, KvK, SKJ, QID, BRIN, AGB). Reports precision and recall per identifier type, compares regex vs spaCy NER, and demonstrates cross-registry verification for accountability use cases. v2: 10 issues fixed from Codex CLI review. Part of the Evidence-Graded Knowledge Graphs research programme (Paper 0: 10.5281/zenodo.19024611).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rogier Meulenaar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: