Briefing examines proposals to improve human rights clauses in EU agreements, highlighting implications for effectiveness.
Human Rights Clauses (HRCs), included in different agreements between the European Union (EU) and third countries, have become well-established tools in the EU’s human rights toolbox. However, despite having been updated several times to make them fit for purpose, they are rarely used in practice, which prompts questions about their effectiveness. Hence, this briefing examines proposals made in recent studies that aim to enhance the impact of HRCs. Measures considered here include making use of permanent monitoring bodies, benchmarks, appropriate measures and broadening the scope of complaints submitted under the Single Entry Point created under the new generation of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). The specific HRCs examined are those included in the EU’s agreements with Ethiopia, Tunisia and Vietnam, three countries in which the human rights situations have deteriorated over recent years. The effectiveness of recent proposals for upgrading the HRCs is tested against the background of these three case studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
N.; id_orcid 0000-0002-3918-3524 Idriz (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: