PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2026Nucleic Acids Research0 citationsOpen Access

EEPD1 evolved a unique DNA clamping dimer protecting reversed replication forks

View Full Paper
RSRunze ShenASAltaf H. SarkerYCYue Chen

Key Points

  • This study aims to define the structure and function of EEPD1 in protecting stalled DNA replication forks.
  • Integrated hybrid structural methods, including SAXS, crystal, and cryo-EM imaging.
  • Analysis of EEPD1's binding interactions with double-stranded DNA.
  • Investigations into EEPD1's evolutionary adaptations and functional role regarding nuclease activity.
  • Discoveries reveal EEPD1’s requirement of a unique dimer structure for DNA clamping.
  • Findings indicate EEPD1 does not possess nuclease activity due to evolutionary loss of catalytic components.
  • Research highlights EEPD1's role in preventing degradation of reversed replication forks by MRE11.
  • Bioinformatics data link EEPD1 to improved patient survival, influenced by oxidative damage mechanisms.

Abstract

Exonuclease/endonuclease/phosphatase (EEP)-fold hydrolases are canonically monomeric phosphodiesterases exemplified by APE1, DNase I, and TDP2 nucleases. While EEP family domain containing protein 1 (EEPD1) acts in DNA stress responses, its proposed nuclease activities are enigmatic. Here, we integrate hybrid structural methods, evolution, biochemistry, cancer genomics, plus molecular and cell biology to define EEPD1 structure, assembly, and function at stalled DNA replication forks. Results imply EEPD1 surprisingly requires both unique EEP domain dimer and distinctive tandem Helix-hairpin-Helix (HhH)2 domains to clamp double-stranded (ds) DNA at reversed DNA replication forks for fork protection. Small-angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS), crystal, and cryo-EM structures unveil an unprecedented tryptophan handshake dimer, conserved interface di-Trp-Pro pocket, and adjustable "wrist" enabling an open-closed conformational switch. EEPD1 dimer cooperatively binds complex dsDNA replication fork intermediates but alone lacks nuclease activity due to loss of key EEP catalytic residues during Metazoan evolution and atmospheric oxygen buildup. Instead, EEPD1 prevents nucleolytic degradation of reversed replication forks by MRE11. Furthermore, cancer bioinformatics support oxidative damage-dependent EEPD1 association as a significant modulator of overall patient survival. Collective findings uncover unexpected EEP dimer and fork protection function in clamping, not cleaving, reversed replication forks for metazoan oxidative stress responses controlling genome stability and cancer outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79e538166e15b153ab8bahttps://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkag188
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1RF-SIRF reveals a replication stress-specific epigenetic code by spatio-temporal mapping of reversed forks2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Features and development of Coot2010 · 30,092 citations
  3. 3Ensembl 20242023 · 780 citations
  4. 4DNA clamp function of the monoubiquitinated Fanconi anaemia ID complex2020 · 96 citations
  5. 5Novel DNA binding motifs in the DNA repair enzyme endonuclease III crystal structure.1995 · 499 citations