PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2026Journal of High Energy Physics3 citationsOpen Access

Magnetic helicity, magnetic monopoles, and Higgs winding

HFHajime FukudaYHYuta HamadaKKKohei Kamada

Key Points

  • This research aims to correct misconceptions about magnetic helicity changes in the presence of magnetic monopoles.
  • Analyzed the integral of the gauge field strength tensor over spacetime.
  • Embedded Maxwell theory with magnetic monopoles into non-Abelian gauge theories.
  • Explored implications on the Higgs field and winding numbers.
  • Related findings to early universe cosmological theories.
  • Established a corrected formula for helicity change when magnetic monopoles are present.
  • Demonstrated the crucial role of winding numbers and Higgs field zeroes in helicity change.
  • Found applicability of results to electroweak theory and baryon number changes.

Abstract

A bstract Changes in magnetic helicity are often discussed across a variety of fields, from condensed matter physics to early universe cosmology. It is frequently stated that the helicity change is given by the integral of the gauge field strength tensor and its dual over spacetime, ∫ F ∧ F . However, this is incorrect when magnetic monopoles once existed in the spacetime. In this paper, we show the correct formula of the helicity change in such a case for the Maxwell theory with the magnetic monopoles. We also discuss what happens when we embed the Maxwell theory with magnetic monopoles into non-Abelian gauge theories. We show that a similar formula holds for the ’t Hooft-Polyakov monopole. In particular, we find the winding numbers and the zeroes of the Higgs field in the non-Abelian gauge theory play a crucial role in the helicity change. The same discussion is also applicable to the electroweak theory, and we discuss the implication of our findings to the baryon number change via the chiral anomaly in the early universe.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fukuda et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79ea18166e15b153ac333https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep03(2026)127
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper