This review demonstrates how compliance and appeasement impact command hallucinations, suggesting improvements for cognitive behavioral therapy interventions.
These findings highlight the need for clinical formulations of CHs to attend closely to the factors driving compliance and appeasement, given their strong association with risk. Targeting the cognitive, relational, emotional, behavioural and developmental influences that sustain these responses-and strengthening resistance-promoting factors-may enhance cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp). To support clinical practice, this review also provides Socratic questions to guide the assessment, formulation and intervention of CHs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Medas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: