Narrative review highlights bioresorbable scaffold technology's potential in peripheral artery disease, implying a shift in treatment strategies.
Endovascular recanalization has revolutionized the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD), offering minimally invasive alternatives to open surgery. However, permanent metallic stents, while effective in restoring blood flow, are associated with long-term complications such as chronic inflammation, restenosis, and stent thrombosis. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) have emerged as an innovative solution, providing temporary mechanical support while delivering antiproliferative drugs before fully degrading, thus eliminating the risks associated with permanent implants. Significant advancements in bioresorbable materials have led to the development of new-generation scaffolds with improved radial strength, controlled degradation rates, and enhanced drug-eluting properties. Several BRS platforms, including polymer- and magnesium-based designs, are undergoing clinical and preclinical evaluation for peripheral applications. Early trials suggest that BRS may offer comparable short-term patency rates to conventional stents while potentially reducing late adverse events. However, challenges such as scaffold thrombosis, mechanical integrity in large and calcified vessels, and long-term efficacy remain under investigation. This narrative review explores the evolution of BRS technology, the mechanisms of scaffold resorption, current clinical evidence, and future prospects for their use in peripheral endovascular interventions. As research progresses, BRS may represent a paradigm shift in the treatment of PAD, offering a balance between structural support and vascular restoration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galassi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: