Demonstrates how a novel hydrogel dressing accelerates healing in MRSA-infected wounds, suggesting new therapies for chronic wounds.
Chronic wounds caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) often stall during the healing process due to persistent inflammation and failed tissue repair. This pathological state primarily results from a vicious cycle formed by the interaction of oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and impaired angiogenesis. To this end, this study employs network pharmacology to reveal that gallic acid (GA, a polyphenol with potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity) promotes skin wound healing by regulating oxidative stress and apoptosis. Subsequently, based on these findings, a dynamic hydrogel dressing with cascade enzyme-like activity was developed. By synergistically modulating the oxidative stress microenvironment, eliminating bacterial infections, promoting angiogenesis, and accelerating the healing of MRSA-infected wounds, it effectively remodels the wound microenvironment. The core of this system is a metal-phenolic network particle (ZCG) self-assembled from Zn²⁺ (antibacterial), Cu²⁺ (angiogenic), and GA. These bioactive particles are embedded in a dynamic hydrogel matrix composed of oxidized fucoidan (OFD) and carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS), which confer self-healing and injectable properties to the dressing. Simultaneously, by synergistically combining metal ions and GA, the hydrogel dressing functions as a "regenerative niche" that effectively eradicates MRSA. It further scavenges excess reactive oxygen species to alleviate inflammation and protect host cells. The system also releases pro-angiogenic copper ions to reconstruct vascular networks, effectively remodeling the wound microenvironment. This promotes collagen deposition and granulation tissue formation, accelerating wound closure. As a universal therapeutic solution for chronic nonhealing wounds, it holds significant clinical translation potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: