This collection presents a theoretical framework explaining galactic rotation without dark matter, suggesting a new cosmological model.
This collection presents the complete framework of the Myo Min Aung Unified Theory (MUT), a scalar‑tensor extension of General Relativity that replaces dark matter and dark energy with a universal scalar resonance field Φ. The theory is grounded on the fundamental mass‑curvature rate constant: fMCR = c/m_p = 1.792 × 10³⁵\,m/(kg· s). The four papers included here cover every aspect of MUT: 1. Paper 1 – Theoretical Foundations (Paper_theory_1_final.pdf): Derives the action, field equations, Newtonian limit, and the modified acceleration law a = a_N + c^2/2∇Φ. It establishes the microphysical normalization fMCR from nuclear mass systematics.2. Paper 2 – Core Equation and Multi‑Scale Predictions (Core_equation_paper_upgrade.pdf): Presents the core equation of MUT, its dimensional consistency, and summarises 50 independent blind tests spanning nuclear physics, quantum entanglement, galactic rotation, and cosmology.3. Paper 3 – Galactic Rotation Curves (SPARC Analysis) (Theory_paper_2_final.pdf): Provides a detailed Bayesian MCMC analysis of 175 SPARC galaxies, showing that MUT fits every rotation curve without dark matter (mean reduced χ^2 < 0.2). Representative fits for NGC 3198, IC 2574 and NGC 2403 are discussed.4. Paper 4 – Complete SPARC Dataset Fitting (Theory_paper_3_final.pdf): Extends the analysis to all 175 galaxies, tabulates the best‑fit parameters A and r_0 for the field gradient model ∇Φ = A/(r+r_0), and demonstrates the narrow distribution of the mass‑weighted resonance field Φ, confirming micro‑to‑macro continuity. Together, these works establish MUT as a viable, testable, and mathematically consistent alternative to the standard cosmological paradigm, with successful predictions across more than 80 orders of magnitude in mass – from nucleons to the observable universe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Myomin Aung (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: