This framework quantifies epistemic stability across domains, revealing key dynamics of drift and collapse.
Derives a domain-invariant Law of Epistemic Degradation via tolerance-scaled MDI_scaled, GYORᴹ classification bands, truth-quality tiers (T₀–T₃), and dynamic operators (γᴹ drift, κᴹ collapse, λᴹ opacity, ρᴹ restoration). Five cross-domain falsification probes passed. Three predictions confirmed: velocity vᴹ precedes MDI threshold (early warning); high λᴹ produces invisible collapse in T₂/T₃ regimes; restoration requires intervention and is asymmetric. Criticality weighting aligns with Basel and SR 11-7 governance. GCM Observatory Series. CC BY 4.0. Related identifiers (add each as a “is supplemented by” or “is part of” relation) ∙ https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19005292 — Paper I: Seam Physics ∙ https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18931019 — GCM V1–V3 Observatory ∙ https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18918145 — GCM Geophysical Proposal
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ronald Brogdon (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: