Study compares the clinical relevance of skin prick test results in Portugal and Finland, indicating distinct allergic responses.
Prevalence of positive skin prick test (SPT) to house dust mite Dermatohagoides pteronyssinus ( Dp ) in subjects sent to allergy testing owing to symptoms range from 81% in Portugal to 37% in Finland. Due to climatic differences, indoor Dp is readily found in Portugal but not in Finland. We compared the clinical relevance of positive SPT to Dp in Porto and Helsinki. A total of 130 patients (75 Porto, 55 Helsinki) participated; 81 with respiratory symptoms, ≥8 years, referred to Hospital São João, Porto or Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki, were included if they had a positive SPT (wheal≥3 mm) to Dp (LETI). Half (n=41) were monosensitized to Dp while the others were polysensitized. 49 patients with negative SPT to Dp were included as controls. After informed consent a double blind placebo controlled conjunctival challenge (CC) with Dp was performed (LETI). Diagnosis of asthma, rhinitis or conjunctivitis was set after medical consultation. Conjunctival challenge to Dp showed a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 96% in terms of concordance of the SPT and CC results. A wheal size greater than 4.8mm in Porto and 3.5mm in Helsinki predicted a positive CC (Porto, AUC=0.986; Helsinki, AUC=0.963). Two patients in the control group showed a positive CC. In Porto the patients with positive CC to Dp had an increased risk for asthma (OR 9.3, 95%CI 2.4-5.7), in Helsinki the risk was increased for rhinoconjuntivitis (OR 4.9, 95%CI 1.8-13.4). The results indicate that a strongly (≥4.3mm) positive SPT to Dp may be a reliable indicator of clinically relevant sensitization in mono and polysensitized subjects. In Portugal positive SPT to Dp is often associated with asthma, in Finland with rhinoconjunctivitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: