PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies2 citationsOpen Access

Development of a microfluidic paper-based analytical device (μPAD) for detection of urea, nitrite, and starch adulteration in milk with smartphone app assisted detection

View Full Paper
KPK.R. Jolvis PouMPMuthukumaran PackirisamyVRVijaya Raghavan

Key Points

  • The aim is to create a device for detecting specific adulterants in milk and automate the reading of results using a smartphone app.
  • Fabrication of μPAD using direct chemical patterning with FluoroPel 800
  • Hydrophobic barriers created on filter paper through spray application
  • Utilization of a smartphone app for interpreting colorimetric responses
  • Assessment of color changes to quantify adulterant levels
  • μPAD successfully detected urea, nitrite, and starch adulteration in milk
  • Colorimetric analysis correlated well with levels of adulteration
  • Smartphone app effectively read urea and nitrite levels from 0.5 to 3.0 g/L and starch from 5.0 to 20.0 g/L
  • The device showed high reliability and sensitivity for on-site testing

Abstract

Milk is a vital part of a balanced diet that supports growth and overall health. However, widespread adulteration has raised serious concerns about its safety and quality. This study focuses to develop a microfluidic paper-based analytical device (μPAD) for the simultaneous detection of urea, nitrite, and starch adulteration in milk. Additionally, the current work aims to develop a smartphone app for automated interpretation of the colorimetric responses. The μPAD was fabricated using direct chemical patterning method. The microfluidic design was printed on a transparent film and used as the positive mask. Hydrophobic patterning was achieved by uniformly spraying the FluoroPel 800 solution onto Whatman grade 4 filter paper using a portable airbrush system operated at a constant spray rate of 0.15 mL/s and a height of 5 mm. After drying, the device was loaded with specific reagents for nitrite, urea, and starch adulteration detection in milk sample. A smartphone app was developed using the Thunkable workspace and integrated with Imagga as the application programming interface (API) platform. The coated paper showed a high contact angle of approximately 119 ± 3°, which confirmed the successful modification of the substrate from hydrophilic to hydrophobic. The result indicated that the liquid was completely confined within the hydrophilic region, with no evidence of spreading or leakage beyond the coated boundaries. The color response analysis showed that the urea detection zone changed from pale yellow at lower concentrations to orange-yellow, while the nitrite detection zone transitioned from light purple to deep reddish-purple as the adulteration levels increased from 0.5 to 3 g/L. On the other hand, the starch detection zone shifted its output color from brown at the initial to dark blue at 20 g/L. The smartphone app demonstrated a high ability to detect adulteration levels of urea and nitrite from 0.5 to 3.0 g/L and starch from 5.0 to 20.0 g/L. The strong correlation between the level of adulterants and observed color changes established the sensitivity and reliability of the μPAD. The platform offers a cost-effective and rapid tool for on-site milk adulteration screening, particularly in resource-limited settings where laboratory testing is impractical. • Direct chemical patterning with FluoroPel 800 enabled strong hydrophobic barriers. • Developed μPAD allowed simultaneous detection of urea, nitrite, and starch in milk. • Colorimetric responses correlated with adulterant levels: urea, nitrite, and starch. • Smartphone app enabled rapid, quantitative, and automated adulteration detection. • μPAD sticker integrated into packaging for on-site monitoring of milk adulteration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba41e04e9516ffd37a1dachttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2026.104555
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper