PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026The Accounting Review0 citations

A Retrospective.

View Full Paper
SZStephen A. Zeff

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the impact of decentralizing the editorial review process for The Accounting Review.
  • Reviewed editorial actions taken as editor of The Accounting Review.
  • Decentralized the review process by appointing three sub-editors in 1980.
  • Sub-editors handled approximately 20% of new manuscripts, selecting reviewers based on expertise.
  • Decentralization improved the assessment of manuscripts based on expert knowledge.
  • The success of this approach is attributed to the skills of the appointed sub-editors.
  • The journal adopted a liberal reproduction policy in light of the Copyright Act of 1976.

Abstract

Abstract The article reviews actions taken by the author as the editor to the journal "The Accounting Review." According to the author, one of the most important decisions taken by him was to decentralize the editorial review process and to designate three individuals to serve as sub-editors beginning in 1980. Approximately one in five of the new manuscripts received since the second half of 1980 were handled by sub-editors, who chose reviewers and made editorial decisions. Sub-editors were assigned manuscripts falling within their respective areas of expertise, thus enabling a more sensitive assessment of the potential of each manuscript. In his opinion this experiment with decentralization has been a success. While the concept of decentralization has thus been shown to work, the measure of its success is unquestionably a function of talents of the three academics Bob Swieringa, Bill Kinney and Dan Collins, who so ably served as sub-editors. Another decision requiring considerable thought and consultation was related to the journal's policy on reproduction of articles. Although some journals had begun assessing a per-page or per-article fee for such reproduction and others had announced no policy at all under the Copyright Act of 1976, the journal decided upon perhaps the most liberal of possible policies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stephen A. Zeff (1983) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba427c4e9516ffd37a2d94https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-4487815
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper