Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic evaluation of YOLO variants improves object detection in side-scan sonar systems, suggesting optimized approaches for operational contexts.
Side-scan sonar is essential to underwater target detection, yet its effectiveness is hindered by scarce annotated data and complex acoustic artifacts. This study systematically evaluates four YOLO variants, YOLOv8n, YOLOv10n, YOLOv11n, and the newly released YOLOv13n, on two public side-scan sonar datasets with limited samples and severe class imbalance. We assess detection accuracy, computational efficiency, inference speed, and transfer learning using COCO pre-trained weights, as well as the impact of optimizer choice between SGD and AdamW. The results reveal distinct strengths: YOLOv8n achieves the fastest inference at 60.98 FPS, with a competitive mAP50 of 0.906, ideal for real-time applications. YOLOv11n offers the best accuracy–efficiency balance, attaining the highest recall of 0.859 and mAP50 of 0.917. YOLOv13n demonstrates exceptional precision of 0.993 and high-IoU localization, with an mAP75 of 0.760. Transfer learning consistently boosts performance, with average mAP50:95 gains exceeding 54% on the more challenging dataset, highlighting its critical role in overcoming data scarcity. SGD generally outperforms AdamW, confirming its suitability as the default optimizer. These findings provide practical guidelines: YOLOv8 for real-time needs, YOLOv11 for balanced performance, and YOLOv13 for precision-critical tasks with ample resources. This work also establishes a benchmark for future underwater autonomous system research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: