Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals firms' resource allocation to compliance under regulations, indicating adaptive managerial behavior.
ABSTRACT: This paper presents a conceptual and empirical analysis of the way in which coalitions of managers (i.e., firms) respond to regulation. The conceptual analysis provides a model of managerial behavior based on the assumption that these coalitions make cost/benefit analyses of activities in their self-interest. The model is used to develop hypothesized responses to the internal accounting control provision of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977. These hypotheses, that the regulation would not directly affect the level of internal accounting controls, but would affect the expenditure of resources for efforts to "prove" compliance with the law, were generally supported by the empirical results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Maher (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: