Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 18, 2026The Accounting Review

The Treasury Stock Method and Conventional Method in Reciprocal Stockholdings - An Amalgamation: A Reply.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

EPEnrico PetriUniversity at Albany, State University of New YorkRMROLAND MINCHUniversity at Albany, State University of New York

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Authors address criticism regarding treasury stock and conventional methods in reciprocal stockholdings, implying clarity in their approach.

Key Points

  • This article aims to clarify misunderstandings regarding the authors' previous article on treasury stock methods in reciprocal stockholdings.
  • Commentary on criticism received from professor Raymond S. Chen.
  • Discussion of treasury stock method and its implications for minority interest.
  • Evaluation of simultaneous equations methods as a supportive approach.
  • Reaffirmation that the traditional treasury stock method misstates minority interest.
  • Clarification that simultaneous equations methods were not the main focus of the prior article.

Cite This Study

Petri et al. (1975) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba42ee4e9516ffd37a3a40https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-4506184
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Treasury Stock Method and Conventional Method in Reciprocal Stockholdings - An Amalgamation: A Comment.1975
  2. 2The Treasury Stock Method and Conventional Method in Reciprocal Stockholdings -- An Amalgamation.1974
  3. 3Equity Accounting for Reciprocal Stockholdings.1988 · 1 citations
  4. 4Reciprocal or Mutual Holdings: Allocating Earnings and Selecting the Accounting Method.1973
  5. 5THE ALLOCATION OF COMBINED NET INCOME IN RECIPROCAL AFFILIATIONS.1961