This editorial analyzes review times in academic journals, revealing implications for publication efficiency.
ABSTRACT: Evidence on review times for academic journals is often based on anecdotal experience. The purpose of this paper is to provide descriptive statistics on the time which papers spend under review and awaiting publication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bowen et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: