Demonstrates evidence of the coherence-decoherence-recoherence cycle in multiple scientific fields, suggesting a unifying principle.
ABSTRACTThis paper presents convergent empirical evidence that thecoherence–decoherence–recoherence (CDR) cycle — proposed as a universalorganising principle in Smith (2026c, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19030094) — isindependently documented across eight scientific disciplines, from quantum biologythrough wound healing, neural memory consolidation, ecological succession, planetaryatmospheric chemistry, and civilisational history. The evidence is presented without priortheoretical framing: a twelve-row master evidence table allows the convergence to beobserved directly before any interpretation is offered. The same three-phase structureappears in each domain with the same requirements: an energy gradient to drive thecycle, and a condensation nucleus around which recoherence organises. The paperidentifies what we term the condensation nucleus as the universal requirement forrecoherence — the seed structure without which dispersed components cannot reforminto a coherent basin. Failed recoherence — the stuck cycle — is shown to be thecommon mechanism underlying chronic disease, ecosystem collapse, failed memoryconsolidation in schizophrenia, and civilisational stagnation. The CDR cycle is proposednot as a new discovery but as the naming of a pattern the scientific literature has beenindependently documenting for decades without recognising its cross-domain identity.Explicit falsification conditions are stated. This paper is the fifth in the SymbioMindBonding Relationships Series (2026)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: