Investigates audit pricing patterns, revealing a premium for Big Eight auditors in a small-client segment, suggesting market differentiation.
ABSTRACT: Simunic [1980] and Palmrose [1986, Appendix A] report contradictory findings about a Big Eight auditor price premium In the "small" auditee segment of the U.S. audit market for publicly-traded companies. The study reported here finds that a Big Eight price premium exists and that the premium exists with respect to both second-tier national firms and local/regional firms. The existence of a price premium Implies Big Eight product differentiation, at least in the "small" auditee market segment. A separate test is made of initial audit engagements. Tests indicate that initial engagements are priced significantly lower than continuing engagements, which supports recent reports of price-cutting behavior. However, no inference is made about the effect of price-cutting on audit quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Francis et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: