PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026The Accounting Review0 citations

Using Linear Programming To Compare Direct and Absorption Costing.

View Full Paper
DGD. Jacque Grinnell

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the income outcomes of direct costing and absorption costing using linear programming methods.
  • Utilized linear programming to model optimal sales and production levels.
  • Applied comparisons between direct costing and absorption costing frameworks.
  • Focused on multiproduct scenarios to illustrate differences.
  • Identified differing optimal sales and production levels between costing methods.
  • Demonstrated that absorption costing can lead to different income maximization outcomes compared to direct costing.

Abstract

Abstract ABSTRACT: Linear programming and optimal product mix decisions directed toward maximizing accounting income typically have assumed the use of direct costing. However, in this article a linear programming model is utilized to establish optimal sales and production levels which maximize income measured in terms of absorption costing. Since optimal sales and production levels may differ under the two systems, the use of linear programming represents a valuable pedagogical approach to the comparison of direct and absorption costing results in multiproduct situations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

D. Jacque Grinnell (1977) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba43584e9516ffd37a480bhttps://doi.org/10.2308/tar-4481659
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper