This article investigates objectivity issues in measurement systems, indicating the need for a new framework in accounting.
ABSTRACT: This article presents the consensus concept of objectivity and two problems of the concept which never have been addressed adequately: (1) observed objectivity (agreement among different measurers applying the same measurement system) may be spuriously inflated by the consensus inherent on various other combinations of rules and measurers; (2) suggestions for improving objectivity typically focus entirely upon measurement systems and virtually ignore the impact of measurers on objectivity. A framework which enables the investigation of these problems is presented. The suggested framework, a multirule-multimeasurer matrix, is an adaptation of the multitrait-multimethod matrix often used to assess the validity of psychological tests and enables investigation of these problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert H. Ashton (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: