This version refines the H4/GZ60 framework to reproduce key particle physics outcomes, indicating significant theoretical advancements.
This work presents Version 2 of Paper 017, a calibrated extension of the H4/GZ60 discrete algebraic framework. The framework investigates whether a 60-state cyclic algebraic system (12 × 5) can organize structures appearing in particle physics, atomic spectra, and discrete symmetry systems. The manuscript preserves and strengthens previously established theorem-level results of the program, including: A discrete SO(4) Casimir derivation reproducing the hydrogen spectrum. Exact generator-level algebra audits for SU(3) and SU(2) × U(1). A revised state dictionary providing an exact cover of the 48 fermionic degrees of freedom of the Standard Model. This exact cover uniquely determines N_gen = 3 and N_H = 1, thereby reproducing the standard one-loop beta coefficients (b1, b2, b3) of the Standard Model gauge running. Paper 017 (Version 2) introduces crucial refinements in the flavor sector and CP violation: The gluon sector is explicitly organized as color-pair transitions consistent with the adjoint representation. The flavor sector is reformulated through a discrete overlap reconstruction rather than direct Yukawa diagonalization, yielding a stable reconstruction of all nine CKM magnitudes within 6% and the correct order of the Jarlskog invariant. A convention-calibrated CKM geometry is established, where the robust radius |ρ + iη| exactly matches the golden-ratio relation 1/φ² at the 10⁻³ level. [NEW in v2] The CP violating phase is shown to admit a Next-to-Leading Order (NLO) algebraic expression: δ_CP ≈ arccos(1/φ² - λ²/2). This correction resolves the previous geometric residual, yielding a phase of 69.17°, which matches the current experimental central value within 0.03°. The purpose of this work is not to claim a completed unified dynamical theory, but to define a rigorous "claim boundary" for the H4/GZ60 program: explicitly separating which components are mathematically exact, which are supported by finite algebraic audits (Level A/B), and which remain open dynamical problems (such as the first-principles RGE origin of φ, and the mechanisms generating Majorana and Higgs masses).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ken et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: